I've run into a problem where one stored procedure calls another and I get an "Invalid Column" error. The child stored proc works fine when run separately.
Some similar errors could easily be cleaned up by using sp_recompile or sp_refreshsqlmodule.
But, turns out there is a little bug in the column name validation when there are temp tables in a child stored proc that have the same name as a temp table in the parent proc.
Solution: rename the temp table in one proc or another. Or, could use variable tables or some other structure in one or the other.
Friday, January 27, 2012
Friday, January 13, 2012
Enable CLR
sp_configure 'show advanced options', 1;
GO
RECONFIGURE;
GO
sp_configure 'clr enabled', 1;
GO
RECONFIGURE;
GO
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms131048.aspx
GO
RECONFIGURE;
GO
sp_configure 'clr enabled', 1;
GO
RECONFIGURE;
GO
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms131048.aspx
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
DROP all VIEWS, FUNCTIONS, PROCEDURES
DECLARE @obj TABLE ( id int identity, objname sysname, objtype sysname ) DECLARE @i int , @sql nvarchar(max) INSERT INTO @obj ( objname, objtype ) SELECT A.name , (case when A.type = 'V' then 'VIEW' when A.type in ('FN','IF','TF') then 'FUNCTION' when A.type = 'P' then 'PROCEDURE' else '' end ) FROM sysobjects A (NOLOCK) WHERE A.type IN ( 'V', 'FN', 'IF', 'TF', 'P' ) ORDER BY (case A.type when 'V' then 3 when 'P' then 1 else 2 end ) , A.name DESC SELECT @i = max(id) FROM @obj WHILE @i > 0 BEGIN SELECT @sql = 'DROP ' + A.objtype + ' ' + A.objname FROM @obj A WHERE A.id = @i PRINT @sql SET @i = @i - 1 END
This is one example where using a table variable and while loop on a relatively small set of data is preferred, simply because the "sysobjects" table will be mutating through the process of the loop. Could still get away with it in a cursor if locks and hints are properly applied, but I still prefer to avoid it when possible.
Using Cursors Optimally
sqlwithmanoj demonstrated cases where using optimization hints such as FAST_FORWARD, FORWARD_ONLY, READ_ONLY can result in cursors that are more performant than while loops on table variables.
http://sqlwithmanoj.wordpress.com/2011/02/07/avoid-cursors-or-use-them-optimally/
http://sqlwithmanoj.wordpress.com/2011/02/07/avoid-cursors-or-use-them-optimally/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)